Eco-Tip Tuesday: Keep It Simple, Silly

December 8, 2009 | 5 Comments

Post image for Eco-Tip Tuesday: Keep It Simple, Silly

When the continuous operation of a system relies on a long and complex chain of crucial suppliers and resources, all running smoothly, that’s pretty much a textbook example of an unsustainable system. Put another way, the systems we take for granted to deliver everything from plasma-screen TV sets to store-bought apple pie are more vulnerable than we may think. 

According to Keith Farnish, “We have been sold The Complexity Myth: the idea that something is only good if it is a product of a complex set of processes, in order that it (or we) can be controlled. We are kept in check by this idea and do not question it because we have forgotten how to live simply; we have been brainwashed to love the world of the complex, and as a result we are prepared to defend the thing that is causing the collapse of the natural world, and our own basic humanity.”

To put it bluntly, we’ve become so utterly dependent on highly complex machinery, bureaucratic social structures and byzantine systems to provide for nearly every aspect of our living, that if a crisis happened (like extreme weather, diminishing groundwater, or running out of oil), we’d be up the proverbial Shit’s Creek. I mean, would you be prepared if you lost electricity to your home for even a couple of weeks?

The alternative: Radical Simplification

From Culture Change:

Simplification has so many benefits that it would not be possible to list them all here in detail, but I can outline four of them which I think capture the essence of simplicity, and show up the myth that complexity is a good, indeed an acceptable thing:

1) Simplicity requires less energy: This is self-evident, for the fewer stages there are in any process, the less energy will be consumed overall. You could argue that heating a house with a load of wood and a hole in the ceiling is more energy-intensive than a combination gas boiler, bu—taking aside the difference between renewable versus non-renewable forms of energy—in order to manufacture the combination gas boiler in the first place requires a similar number of processes as to manufacture a television. If you want more efficient heating, hammering out a rocket stove from a few sheets of metal is relatively far simpler. In addition, the more stages involved in anything, the less accountability is possible, and thus the more opportunity for energy wastage.

2) Simplicity is connected: Following on from the previous point, accountability isn’t really about economics, it is about knowledge. If I were to buy a cord of wood that had originated from a forest far away, then it would have had to pass through a number of stages to get from the source to the user: the felling of the tree(s); the sawing and preparation of the timber; the movement to the port and subsequent transportation by sea and/or land to the point at which it is available to me, or at least the person who gets it to me. Through these different stages I have progressively lost connection with the origin of the wood; I have no sight of the trees, I cannot feel the soil, I cannot smell the air where the tree once stood. I do not care. That is the way of the civilized. Compare this to a person who cuts her own wood from a tree she felled, and uses it to build a shelter. [sic. Connected people do not shit where they eat.]

3) Simplicity is stable: As Thomas Homer-Dixon described so vividly in The Upside Of Down, complex societies are inherently unstable, for they rely on a multitude of different stages and processes connected by an equally complex set of linkages, any one of which can be critical to the efficient operation of the system as a whole. Bring down a major power line to a processing plant, shut down a distribution computer, or blockade a port, and the whole dependent system may break down, particularly one that is already under stress, as so many systems are in the just-in-time economy. If you grow your own food, or ideally are a member of a small growing community, then you may be vulnerable to seasonal aberrations or pests, but so long as you do it right then your food supply is safe, and not subject to the hazards of complexity.

4) Simplicity is democratic: Complexity is used to enforce the systems of control that the Culture of Empire uses to keep us subjects of that culture. One man with a sword can control perhaps half a dozen people without swords; one man with an agenda, and a military establishment under his control can control entire nations. Within a cooperative society, a simple society working on egalitarian principles, no one can wield power without challenge. You have a say, as does everyone, for there can be no ivory towers or impregnable fortresses in the simple society—you need complexity to build them.

According to Farnish, the mindset that brought us the equation “civilization = better living = mind-boggling complexity” is flawed and should be reconsidered in a 21st-century post-peak world. “Unless we are prepared to once again embrace the simple then we have no future as a species…except, perhaps those few remaining people who still live simply.”

Get Real Simple.
There is no singular correct way to simplify our complex way of living. The challenge is to add a bit of radical simplicity and self-sufficiency to your unique life every chance you get. Here are some ideas:

  • Plant an organic vegetable garden, or yardshare with a neighbor and harvest more together.
  • Grow fruit or nut trees.
  • Raise some backyard chickens.
  • Get rid of your TV, and in its place, take up something like making homemade yogurt, homebrewing beer, beekeeping, quilting, etc.
  • Do any of the above with children.
  • Join or start a Transition Community.
  • Cloth diaper.
  • Install a composting toilet, solar system, wood stove, etc.
  • Quit eating foods that come in cans, bags and boxes.
  • Buy local as often as possible, especially local food.
  • Commit to walking or biking everywhere you can.
  • Try to buy nothing new for a year—except food, toiletries, socks and underwear. You may buy second hand, when needed.
  • Join a food co-op, CSA or a credit union (or all three!).
  • Contact your local and federal legislators and demand strong and swift action on climate change and renewable energy in your community.

What will you do to radically simplify your life in 2010?

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

Curiousfarmer December 15, 2009 at 4:58 am

Thanks Dawn for this informative and thought-provoking post. I especially liked the link on Transition communities. Never heard of them before.
I’ll include a link to my blog and pictures of trees ready to be cut up for firewood. Hope you like it.
http://curiousfarmer.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/heating-with-wood-blizzard-dec-09/

Reply

Keith Farnish December 10, 2009 at 1:03 pm

Hi Dawn

This is the myth created by governments to disempower people – that individuals are only responsible for a minority of emissions; but the thing it, who buys the stuff that causes the cargo ships to be used, who uses the electricity that causes the power plant emissions, who buys the paper and palm oil that causes the deforestation – the only thing that’s directly out of our control is war; and that doesn’t have to happen if we stop believing the myths of Empire.

You are far more powerful than you realise.

Reply

Dawn Gifford December 10, 2009 at 11:50 pm

Brilliant.

Which brings us back around to why doing things to foster greater personal and community self-sufficiency is so important.

Thank you so much for sharing your wisdom.

Reply

Keith Farnish December 10, 2009 at 5:57 am

Thanks for reposting this – I liked your development of the ideas; and I’m not surprised it can be taken in all sorts of directions as it’s such an obvious concept: simple is good.

I would only take issue with your last point: “Write to your local and federal legislators and demand strong and swift action on climate change and renewable energy in your community.” This is out of kilter with all the other (good) tips, for it suggests that the behemothic, and complex, systems of government are for the good. Local, representative, consensus-based decision-making is a good thing: we don’t have that. They work for corporations, not us.

Best

Keith

Reply

Dawn Gifford December 10, 2009 at 10:43 am

Keith,

Thanks so much for commenting!! I actually agree with you completely about how governments (especially federal) work for corporations, not us. However, given that most pollution is created by corporate activities (e.g. just 16 cargo ships emit more sulfur dioxide than all the cars in the world!) and given that governments are supposed to work for us, I’m not sure what else we can do to create change in this realm!!

Though incongruous with the rest of the list, sometimes lobbying (or protesting) the government works, especially at a local level. However, doing so shouldn’t be at the expense of putting most of our energies into rebuilding vibrant, self-sufficient, low-carbon communities. For I believe that is truly the only thing that can sustain us.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: