<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Inconvenient Truth About Canola Oil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Living Lightly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:11:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-552</guid>
		<description>I have written several posts on my own blog which concern Roundup and Monsanto. I am particularly incensed with their recent production of &#039;kill seeds&#039; that will not re-germinate

I am astonished at what we are allowing Monsanto to get away with. Their motto of &quot;No Food Shall Be Grown That We Do Not Own&quot; is about to become our reality.

To make matters worse, our own FDA is just a revolving door for the people like Michael Taylor and Donald Rumsfeld, who influence federal policy and return to work for Monsanto after they leave public office.

For a complete overview of what Monsanto is up to, you must watch the DVD,    &quot;The World According To Monsanto&quot; . http://www.health.6millionrich.com.

I have taken the time to break the dvd up into 10 - 10 minute segments. You will never look at food production the same way again.

Thank you, Dawn, for allowing me to expose as many people as possible to the threat that Monsanto poses to the health of our children. For Ross, the video has plenty of documentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written several posts on my own blog which concern Roundup and Monsanto. I am particularly incensed with their recent production of &#8216;kill seeds&#8217; that will not re-germinate</p>
<p>I am astonished at what we are allowing Monsanto to get away with. Their motto of &#8220;No Food Shall Be Grown That We Do Not Own&#8221; is about to become our reality.</p>
<p>To make matters worse, our own FDA is just a revolving door for the people like Michael Taylor and Donald Rumsfeld, who influence federal policy and return to work for Monsanto after they leave public office.</p>
<p>For a complete overview of what Monsanto is up to, you must watch the DVD,    &#8220;The World According To Monsanto&#8221; . <a href="http://www.health.6millionrich.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.health.6millionrich.com</a>.</p>
<p>I have taken the time to break the dvd up into 10 &#8211; 10 minute segments. You will never look at food production the same way again.</p>
<p>Thank you, Dawn, for allowing me to expose as many people as possible to the threat that Monsanto poses to the health of our children. For Ross, the video has plenty of documentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What We&#8217;re Reading</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>What We&#8217;re Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-430</guid>
		<description>[...] the Canola please! This article on canola has concretely confirmed for me the ill-effects of this genetically modified oil marketed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Canola please! This article on canola has concretely confirmed for me the ill-effects of this genetically modified oil marketed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fight Back Friday September 25th &#124; Food Renegade</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Fight Back Friday September 25th &#124; Food Renegade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-424</guid>
		<description>[...] Show (What Woody taught us)13. Kara @ Home With Purpose (Restocking &amp; Catching Up!)14. Dawn @ Small Footprint Family &#8211; The Inconvenient Truth About Canola Oil15. Hugging the Coast (Cajun Fried Linguine)16. Troy @ I Refuse to Recede &#8212; Herb of the week [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Show (What Woody taught us)13. Kara @ Home With Purpose (Restocking &amp; Catching Up!)14. Dawn @ Small Footprint Family &#8211; The Inconvenient Truth About Canola Oil15. Hugging the Coast (Cajun Fried Linguine)16. Troy @ I Refuse to Recede &#8212; Herb of the week [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Gifford</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Gifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Thank you everyone for your comments, and for making healthier choices for yourself and your families. I had no idea this issue would strike such a chord with so many people. 

Traditional, real food is very important to me (and to us all) for both health and environmental reasons, so I hope you&#039;ll read some of my other food-related posts in the archives, as well as come back to visit again. I typically write about food myths and healthy food choices on Fridays.

Best,
Dawn @ Smallfootprintfamily</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you everyone for your comments, and for making healthier choices for yourself and your families. I had no idea this issue would strike such a chord with so many people. </p>
<p>Traditional, real food is very important to me (and to us all) for both health and environmental reasons, so I hope you&#8217;ll read some of my other food-related posts in the archives, as well as come back to visit again. I typically write about food myths and healthy food choices on Fridays.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Dawn @ Smallfootprintfamily</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Gifford</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Gifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment. My primary sources, if you read the whole article, are &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_G._Enig&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dr. Mary Enig&lt;/a&gt; and the work of Dr. Weston A. Price and the Weston Price Foundation, for which there are additional links within the post. 

The genetic manipulation that made traditional rapeseed into Canola oil is called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science.ca/scientists/scientistprofile.php?pID=348&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;seed splitting&lt;/a&gt;, a highly technical hybridization process that can only be done in a lab. This allowed plant scientists to analyze the half-seed using Gas-Liquid Chromotograpy (GLC) and then select from the remaining partitioned seed only those showing desirable traits for the next generation. Seed splitting is not conventional plant cross-breeding, which has been done for thousands of years through carefully selecting and cross-pollinating species over time.

However, today, Canola oil has been genetically engineered by inserting the DNA of bacteria to bring forth qualities that would never be natural to a plant through any breeding technique. This engineering renders the rapeseed plant relatively immune to toxic Roundup, and enables the creator (Monsanto) to patent the seed, preventing farmers from saving the seed. One of the problems with this is that canola is wind pollinated, and pollen from the genetically engineered variety easily drifts and contaminates the fields of farmers who are trying to grow organic Canola oil. This has resulted in lawsuits and great loss of livelihood for many farmers whose crops were accidentally contaminated.

There is also substantial evidence that the Roundup Ready gene has drifted to related weed species, creating a new generation of &quot;super-weeds&quot; that are Roundup resistant as well, leading to even heavier usage of the toxic chemical or even stronger, more dangerous herbicides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment. My primary sources, if you read the whole article, are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_G._Enig" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Dr. Mary Enig</a> and the work of Dr. Weston A. Price and the Weston Price Foundation, for which there are additional links within the post. </p>
<p>The genetic manipulation that made traditional rapeseed into Canola oil is called <a href="http://www.science.ca/scientists/scientistprofile.php?pID=348" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">seed splitting</a>, a highly technical hybridization process that can only be done in a lab. This allowed plant scientists to analyze the half-seed using Gas-Liquid Chromotograpy (GLC) and then select from the remaining partitioned seed only those showing desirable traits for the next generation. Seed splitting is not conventional plant cross-breeding, which has been done for thousands of years through carefully selecting and cross-pollinating species over time.</p>
<p>However, today, Canola oil has been genetically engineered by inserting the DNA of bacteria to bring forth qualities that would never be natural to a plant through any breeding technique. This engineering renders the rapeseed plant relatively immune to toxic Roundup, and enables the creator (Monsanto) to patent the seed, preventing farmers from saving the seed. One of the problems with this is that canola is wind pollinated, and pollen from the genetically engineered variety easily drifts and contaminates the fields of farmers who are trying to grow organic Canola oil. This has resulted in lawsuits and great loss of livelihood for many farmers whose crops were accidentally contaminated.</p>
<p>There is also substantial evidence that the Roundup Ready gene has drifted to related weed species, creating a new generation of &#8220;super-weeds&#8221; that are Roundup resistant as well, leading to even heavier usage of the toxic chemical or even stronger, more dangerous herbicides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-414</guid>
		<description>so your primary source is a newsletter put out by a SDA ministry...i wish you&#039;d cite all the resources you (and he) used to come up with these claims...

by the way, the genetic manipulation you refer to that produced the original canola oil was CROSS-BREEDING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so your primary source is a newsletter put out by a SDA ministry&#8230;i wish you&#8217;d cite all the resources you (and he) used to come up with these claims&#8230;</p>
<p>by the way, the genetic manipulation you refer to that produced the original canola oil was CROSS-BREEDING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dawn, for your feedback.  I definitely understand the difference, and concur that each writing style has its place; however, the sampling of comments which follow this post are what trouble me.  Emily feels a need to &quot;re-read parts of it so i can better explain to friends and family (sic),&quot; so how &quot;easy-to-read&quot; the summary is in-and-of-itself might be called into question.  Food Renegade lauds it as a &quot;well-researched post,&quot; but as you pointed out the &quot;research&quot; was done by Fallon and Enig.  To my reading it was NOT peer-reviewed, but rather conducted by a private, not-for-profit foundation and published on-line by the same organization, rather than in a refereed, peer-reviewed journal, which calls its credibility into question somewhat.  That&#039;s not to say it isn&#039;t completely true and that your post isn&#039;t entirely accurate.  The point is.  I HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING THAT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dawn, for your feedback.  I definitely understand the difference, and concur that each writing style has its place; however, the sampling of comments which follow this post are what trouble me.  Emily feels a need to &#8220;re-read parts of it so i can better explain to friends and family (sic),&#8221; so how &#8220;easy-to-read&#8221; the summary is in-and-of-itself might be called into question.  Food Renegade lauds it as a &#8220;well-researched post,&#8221; but as you pointed out the &#8220;research&#8221; was done by Fallon and Enig.  To my reading it was NOT peer-reviewed, but rather conducted by a private, not-for-profit foundation and published on-line by the same organization, rather than in a refereed, peer-reviewed journal, which calls its credibility into question somewhat.  That&#8217;s not to say it isn&#8217;t completely true and that your post isn&#8217;t entirely accurate.  The point is.  I HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING THAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Gifford</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Gifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Ross, Thanks for your comment. Indeed this is a blog post, not a research paper intended for a grade at school. Blog posts are typically easy-to-read summaries of information that reflect the concerns of the author and the theme of the blog. They also often contain links to more information for readers like yourself who want more detail. As such, if you click on any of the links within this post, you will find ample peer-reviewed science with tons of footnotes, especially within &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.westonaprice.org/knowyourfats/conola.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;The Great Con-ola,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; which goes into far more detail about the history and harm of Canola oil than I do.

Best, 
Dawn @ SmallFootprintFamily</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross, Thanks for your comment. Indeed this is a blog post, not a research paper intended for a grade at school. Blog posts are typically easy-to-read summaries of information that reflect the concerns of the author and the theme of the blog. They also often contain links to more information for readers like yourself who want more detail. As such, if you click on any of the links within this post, you will find ample peer-reviewed science with tons of footnotes, especially within <a href="http://www.westonaprice.org/knowyourfats/conola.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">&#8220;The Great Con-ola,&#8221;</a> which goes into far more detail about the history and harm of Canola oil than I do.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Dawn @ SmallFootprintFamily</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Indeed, his is a VERY interesting post, but is it credible?  I have absolutely NO WAY of knowing?  I love a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but with out data to back it up, it&#039;s just that--a theory.  Not a fact.  If the author turned this paper in to his/her professor at school, it would summarily be returned with an &quot;F&quot; at the top and the comment:  &quot;No references sited; quote your sources.&quot;  Any undergrad can tell you the first rule of decent research is to find peer-reviewed literature that supports your hypothesis and use that to bolster your argument.  WHERE&#039;S THE EVIDENCE???  Subsequently, this is all OPINION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, his is a VERY interesting post, but is it credible?  I have absolutely NO WAY of knowing?  I love a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but with out data to back it up, it&#8217;s just that&#8211;a theory.  Not a fact.  If the author turned this paper in to his/her professor at school, it would summarily be returned with an &#8220;F&#8221; at the top and the comment:  &#8220;No references sited; quote your sources.&#8221;  Any undergrad can tell you the first rule of decent research is to find peer-reviewed literature that supports your hypothesis and use that to bolster your argument.  WHERE&#8217;S THE EVIDENCE???  Subsequently, this is all OPINION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cajun Chef Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/2009/09/25/the-inconvenient-truth-about-canola-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Cajun Chef Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smallfootprintfamily.com/?p=2144#comment-402</guid>
		<description>An eye opener, thank you for spelling out the truth behind Canola oil. Hardly use it today, but I can remember when dietitians were pushing this stuff on us for our &quot;heart healthy&quot; menus and modified recipes when I was in the health care industry.

Regards,
CCR  =:~)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An eye opener, thank you for spelling out the truth behind Canola oil. Hardly use it today, but I can remember when dietitians were pushing this stuff on us for our &#8220;heart healthy&#8221; menus and modified recipes when I was in the health care industry.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
CCR  =:~)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
